CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
A reviewer states that, in a general sense, all provisions are contingent because they are uncertain in timing or amount. Hari Steels Ltd's accountant therefore proposes to label every provision as a contingent liability and keep it off the balance sheet. Which statement correctly reflects Ind AS 37?
The accountant is wrong. Although provisions are uncertain in timing or amount, Ind AS 37 uses 'contingent' only for items not recognised, namely those confirmed by uncertain future events outside the entity's control and liabilities failing the recognition criteria. Provisions meeting the criteria are recognised as liabilities.
- AThe accountant is right, since every provision is uncertain and so must be treated as contingent
- BWithin the Standard, the term 'contingent' is reserved for liabilities and assets not recognised because their existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control, and also for liabilities that fail the recognition criteria; provisions meeting the criteria are recognisedCorrect
- CProvisions are contingent only if their amount is estimated as a range
- DThe term contingent applies only to assets, never to liabilities
Explanation
Ind AS 37 acknowledges that provisions are uncertain in timing or amount, but it restricts the term 'contingent' to items not recognised, being those confirmed only by uncertain future events outside the entity's control, and to liabilities failing the recognition criteria. Provisions that are present obligations with a probable outflow and a reliable estimate are recognised as liabilities. The accountant's proposal confuses the general sense of the word with its defined use.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets questions
- Which statement best describes how Ind AS 37 treats a provision in contrast with a contingent liability?
- Kaveri Pharma Ltd has a present obligation from a past event for a product liability matter. An outflow is probable, but the range of outcom…
- Under Ind AS 37, a transaction that meets the definition of a provision is recognised as a liability only when certain conditions are met. W…
- Kaveri Auto Ltd has a present obligation from a past event. An outflow is probable, but the matter is so complex that no sufficiently reliab…
- Himalaya Pharma Ltd faces four separate matters at the reporting date. (1) A present obligation, outflow probable, reliably estimated at Rs …
- Kaveri Infra Ltd is defendant in three matters at the reporting date. Matter 1: present obligation, outflow probable, amount reliably estima…