CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Kaveri Pharma Ltd has a present obligation from a past event for a product liability matter. An outflow is probable, but the range of outcomes is so wide that no sufficiently reliable estimate of the amount can be made. Which treatment follows Ind AS 37?
It is a contingent liability and is not recognised as a provision. Although a present obligation exists and an outflow is probable, Ind AS 37 requires a sufficiently reliable estimate for recognition. Without one, the obligation is only disclosed.
- ARecognise a provision at the lowest conceivable amount
- BDo not recognise a provision; treat it as a contingent liability because the recognition criteria are not metCorrect
- CRecognise a provision at the highest conceivable amount
- DRecognise a contingent asset of equal amount
Explanation
A present obligation that does not meet the recognition criteria, because a sufficiently reliable estimate of the amount cannot be made, is a contingent liability. It is not recognised as a provision. Options A and C wrongly recognise a provision without a reliable estimate. Option D has no basis, since the item is a liability and not an asset.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets questions
- Which statement best describes how Ind AS 37 treats a provision in contrast with a contingent liability?
- Under Ind AS 37, a transaction that meets the definition of a provision is recognised as a liability only when certain conditions are met. W…
- Kaveri Infra Ltd is defendant in three matters at the reporting date. Matter 1: present obligation, outflow probable, amount reliably estima…
- Kaveri Engineering Ltd has a present obligation from a past event, and an outflow of economic benefits is probable. However, the company can…
- Which of the following best captures why Ind AS 37 says that in a general sense all provisions are contingent, yet uses the term 'contingent…
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd. is sued by a customer for alleged defective fabric. At the reporting date, the company's lawyers say it is not yet cl…