CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Kaveri Auto Ltd has a present obligation from a past event. An outflow is probable, but the matter is so complex that no sufficiently reliable estimate of the amount can be made. How does Ind AS 37 classify this item?
It is a contingent liability. Ind AS 37 describes present obligations that do not meet the recognition criteria as contingent liabilities, and this includes cases where a sufficiently reliable estimate of the amount cannot be made. A provision is recognised only when a reliable estimate is possible.
- AProvision, recognised at the best guess of management
- BContingent liability, because the recognition criteria are not metCorrect
- CContingent asset, because the amount is unknown
- DProvision, but only if the outflow exceeds the entity's net worth
Explanation
Ind AS 37 says provisions are recognised assuming a reliable estimate can be made. A present obligation for which a sufficiently reliable estimate cannot be made does not meet the recognition criteria. It is therefore a contingent liability. Option A is wrong because recognition requires a reliable estimate.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets questions
- Ind AS 37 uses the word 'contingent' in a restricted sense, although in a general sense all provisions are uncertain in timing or amount. Wh…
- Under Ind AS 37, which statement best explains why, in a general sense, all provisions are described as contingent, yet the Standard restric…
- Consider these statements for Ind AS 37. (I) A provision is recognised for a present obligation where an outflow is probable and a reliable …
- Narmada Infra Ltd has a present obligation from a past event. The probability of an outflow is assessed at 35%, so an outflow is not probabl…
- Kaveri Textiles Ltd faces a claim from a customer. Legal counsel advises that it is not probable that Kaveri has a present obligation, but i…
- Ind AS 37 notes that, in a general sense, all provisions are contingent. Meghna Textiles Ltd's finance head asks why provisions are still re…