FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Credit Value at Risk
A risk analyst compares through-the-cycle (TTC) and point-in-time (PIT) PD estimates for a portfolio during a sharp economic downturn. Which statement is most accurate?
Point-in-time PDs respond to current conditions and increase in a downturn, whereas through-the-cycle PDs are averaged across the cycle and remain comparatively stable. This is why PIT measures are more procyclical.
- APIT PDs rise in the downturn, while TTC PDs stay relatively stable across the cycleCorrect
- BTTC PDs rise more than PIT PDs because they use current macro data
- CBoth measures are identical when ratings are based on financial ratios
- DPIT PDs remain stable because they average over a full cycle
Explanation
PIT PDs reflect current conditions and so are procyclical, rising in a downturn. TTC PDs average over a full cycle and are comparatively stable. The options reversing this describe the wrong measure.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Credit Value at Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Credit Value at Risk questions
- A portfolio has three independent loans, each with exposure of USD 10 million, a one-year default probability of 2%, and loss given default …
- A portfolio has 100 independent loans, each USD 1 million exposure, LGD 100%, default probability 4%. Using a normal approximation to the nu…
- A portfolio holds two loans, each of exposure USD 10 million, with LGD of 100% and a one-year default probability of 4% for each. The defaul…
- A risk analyst compares the KMV approach with the basic Merton model for estimating default probabilities. Which statement about KMV is corr…
- Two obligors, A and B, each have a one-year default probability of 10%. The joint default probability is 2%. What is the default correlation…
- A bank's credit VaR model produces a 99.9% one-year loss of 180 million on a portfolio with expected loss of 40 million. A validator replace…