FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction
A risk manager at an asset manager builds a stress scenario by selecting a small set of key market variables, shocking them, and then using the historical covariance structure of all other risk factors to infer their conditional shocks. Which feature of this approach most directly supports the plausibility of the scenario?
Plausibility comes from implying the other factors' shocks from their estimated relationships with the shocked variables. Because the remaining moves follow the historical co-movement structure, the whole scenario is internally coherent, unlike independent worst-case shocks or zeroing out the other factors.
- AShocks to the remaining factors are set to zero to avoid double counting
- BEach factor is shocked independently by its worst historical move
- CShocks to the remaining factors are implied by their estimated relationships with the shocked variables, so the whole scenario is internally coherentCorrect
- DThe scenario probability is fixed at the 99% level by construction
Explanation
Market-driven scenarios shock a few chosen variables and propagate the effect to other factors through estimated co-movement (conditional expectations). This keeps the full scenario consistent with observed market relationships. Shocking each factor independently by its worst move ignores correlations and gives implausible combinations.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction questions
- A risk committee reviews a scenario result showing a 12% portfolio loss. The scenario was generated by shocking only the equity index by -25…
- Assume factors X and Y are jointly normal with zero means. Factor X has daily volatility of 2.0%, factor Y has daily volatility of 3.0%, and…
- A risk manager at an asset manager wants stress scenarios that avoid the criticism that purely historical or purely hypothetical scenarios a…
- In constructing a plausible market-driven scenario, why does a risk manager set the non-shocked factors to their conditional expected values…
- A portfolio has exposures to two factors, A and B. The scenario sets A's shock at -5.0%. A has volatility 2.5% and B has volatility 4.0%. Th…
- A risk manager at an asset manager argues that purely historical stress scenarios, such as replaying 2008, are insufficient for stress testi…