FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction
A risk manager at an asset manager wants stress scenarios that are plausible and anchored in observed market behavior rather than chosen purely by judgment. Which approach best reflects the market-driven scenario method?
The market-driven approach shocks a key risk factor and uses observed co-movement among factors, from historical or market-implied data, to determine the consistent moves in the others. This makes the scenario plausible, unlike isolated shocks, repeated worst days, or arbitrary management-chosen numbers.
- ASpecify a large shock to one risk factor and assume all other factors remain unchanged
- BUse historical and market-implied information on how risk factors co-move to derive the likely moves in other factors, given a stated shock to a key factorCorrect
- CSelect the worst single-day loss in the portfolio's history and repeat it for ten days
- DAsk senior management to assign arbitrary shocks to each factor so the scenario is severe
Explanation
Market-driven scenarios start from a shock to a chosen factor and use the observed statistical relationships among factors to infer the consistent moves in the rest. Holding other factors fixed ignores co-movement and is typically implausible. Repeating the worst day or using arbitrary shocks has no link to market-based dependence.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction questions
- A firm designs a stress scenario by choosing the shocked factors first and then assessing the plausibility of the whole scenario. Which appr…
- A risk committee reviews a scenario result showing a 12% portfolio loss. The scenario was generated by shocking only the equity index by -25…
- Assume factors X and Y are jointly normal with zero means. Factor X has daily volatility of 2.0%, factor Y has daily volatility of 3.0%, and…
- A risk manager at an asset manager wants stress scenarios that avoid the criticism that purely historical or purely hypothetical scenarios a…
- In constructing a plausible market-driven scenario, why does a risk manager set the non-shocked factors to their conditional expected values…
- A portfolio has exposures to two factors, A and B. The scenario sets A's shock at -5.0%. A has volatility 2.5% and B has volatility 4.0%. Th…