FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Credit Value at Risk
A risk manager compares two loan portfolios with identical individual default probabilities and identical exposures. Portfolio A has a higher pairwise default correlation than Portfolio B. Which statement best describes the credit loss distributions, assuming expected loss is the same?
Higher default correlation leaves expected loss unchanged but makes defaults cluster, widening the loss distribution and fattening the right tail. Portfolio A therefore has greater unexpected loss and a higher credit VaR than Portfolio B, even though individual default probabilities and exposures are identical.
- APortfolio A has the same unexpected loss as B because expected loss is identical
- BPortfolio A has a fatter right tail and a higher credit VaR than Portfolio BCorrect
- CPortfolio A has a thinner right tail because defaults cluster in few periods
- DPortfolio A has lower credit VaR because higher correlation reduces default probability
Explanation
Expected loss depends only on default probabilities, exposures and LGD, so it is unchanged. Higher default correlation makes defaults cluster, raising the variance and fattening the right tail, so credit VaR and unexpected loss rise. Option 0 ignores that unexpected loss depends on correlation.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Credit Value at Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Credit Value at Risk questions
- A bank's credit risk team computes expected loss on a corporate term loan using the standard decomposition. Which expression correctly gives…
- A bank has 5 year cumulative default probabilities for a BB-rated obligor. The cumulative PD at 1 year is 2.0% and at 2 years is 5.0%. Assum…
- A risk analyst compares CreditMetrics with CreditRisk+ for a portfolio of small corporate loans. Which statement correctly describes a core …
- A CreditRisk+ portfolio has an expected loss of USD 12 million. In the extended model, default rates are driven by a single gamma-distribute…
- A risk analyst uses the Vasicek single-factor model to estimate the worst-case default rate (WCDR) of a large homogeneous loan portfolio at …
- A loan portfolio has exposure of USD 500 million, LGD of 40% and a one-year PD of 2% per loan. A Vasicek model gives a 99.9% worst-case defa…