Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Liquidity Risk Management

A risk manager notes that a bank's LCR is comfortably above 100% but its NSFR is just below 100%. Which interpretation is most appropriate?

The bank can withstand a 30-day stress but has a structural funding weakness. A high LCR means ample HQLA for short-term outflows, while an NSFR below 100% means stable funding is insufficient for its assets and activities over one year, indicating overreliance on short-term funding.

  1. AThe bank is short of high-quality liquid assets for a 30-day stress but funds its long-term assets adequately
  2. BThe bank is well placed for a 30-day stress but relies too heavily on short-term funding relative to the liquidity of its assets over one yearCorrect
  3. CThe bank has breached its leverage ratio requirement
  4. DThe bank has insufficient Tier 1 capital against risk-weighted assets

Explanation

A high LCR shows adequate HQLA against 30-day net outflows. An NSFR under 100% shows available stable funding is below required stable funding, indicating structural maturity mismatch with excessive reliance on less stable funding. The other options confuse the metrics with capital measures.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Liquidity Risk Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Liquidity Risk Management questions