FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects
A risk manager reviews a CSA under which cash collateral is posted daily, but the margin period of risk (MPOR) used for the counterparty exposure model is 10 business days. Which statement best explains why residual exposure remains despite daily variation margin?
Residual exposure remains because the portfolio value can change during the margin period of risk, which runs from the last successful margin exchange until the defaulted position is closed out and replaced. Collateral held then may not cover the new exposure, even with daily variation margin.
- ACollateral is only received after a default is declared and the close-out amount is calculated
- BVariation margin eliminates all market risk, so residual exposure arises only from legal risk
- CResidual exposure arises because the exposure can move during the time between the last successful margin call and the close-out and replacement of the positionCorrect
- DResidual exposure exists because the netting agreement is unenforceable
Explanation
The MPOR covers the period from the last margin exchange through default detection, grace period, close-out and re-hedging. Market values can change over this window, leaving uncollateralized exposure. Legal risk and unenforceability are separate issues, not the reason for MPOR-based gap exposure.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects questions
- A bank's netting agreement with a counterparty is found by legal opinion to be unenforceable in the counterparty's jurisdiction, and the cou…
- A bank and a hedge fund trade under an ISDA-style master agreement with close-out netting. The hedge fund defaults. Which statement best des…
- A bank has n identical trades with a counterparty, each with the same exposure volatility and pairwise correlation rho between trade values,…
- Bank B and Fund F have two netting sets under separate master agreements. Netting set 1 has a net value of +20 million to Bank B; netting se…
- Under a netting agreement enforceable in the relevant jurisdiction, Bank A has three terminated trades with a defaulting counterparty. The c…
- In insolvency law, how does set-off differ from close-out netting as risk mitigants for a creditor?