Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models

A risk manager wants to backtest a bank's full predictive VaR distribution rather than only counting exceedances. She converts each day's realized P&L into the probability integral transform (PIT) value using the model's forecast distribution. If the model is correctly specified, what should the PIT series look like?

Under a correctly specified model, the PIT values are independent draws from a uniform distribution on [0,1]. Distribution backtests compare the empirical PIT distribution to this uniform. Only after applying the inverse normal transform do they become standard normal, as used in the Berkowitz test.

  1. AIndependent draws from a standard uniform distribution on [0,1]Correct
  2. BIndependent draws from a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance 1 for the raw PIT values
  3. CA series with an increasing trend as volatility rises
  4. DDraws that cluster in the tails of [0,1]

Explanation

The PIT of a realized outcome under the true forecast distribution is uniform on [0,1] and independent over time. Distribution tests such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling compare the empirical PIT distribution with this uniform. The normal option applies only after a further inverse-normal transform, as in Berkowitz, not to raw PIT values.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models questions