CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Art of Advocacy and Appearances
A Section 8 company's compromise and arrangement proceeding under the Companies Act, 1956 was pending before a High Court immediately before the notified date, and the High Court had reserved orders on whether to allow it. Under section 434 as it now stands, how is it dealt with?
It continues under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. Section 434 transfers only non-winding-up proceedings where orders are not reserved, so a matter with reserved orders remains with the High Court under the old law.
- ATransferred to the Tribunal from the stage before transfer
- BDealt with under the 1956 Act and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959Correct
- CDismissed, with liberty to file a fresh application before the Tribunal
- DTransferred to the Company Law Board
Explanation
Section 434(1)(c) transfers non-winding-up proceedings only if orders are not reserved by the High Courts. Proceedings reserved for orders are, under the last provisos, dealt with under the 1956 Act and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The Company Law Board no longer receives transfers.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Art of Advocacy and Appearances shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Art of Advocacy and Appearances questions
- In a penalty proceeding, Arjun Pharma Ltd is alleged to have defaulted in complying with section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013. Its represe…
- A Section 8 company, Shiksha Sewa Foundation, authorises Kavita by a resolution of its Board to act as its representative at a general meeti…
- Verma Pharma Ltd. is applying to the Tribunal for approval to revise its financial statements for an earlier year under Section 131. The com…
- Meera, a company secretary, is to appear before a Tribunal on behalf of her client. Her senior advises that effective advocacy depends mainl…
- During a hearing, the presiding member puts a pointed question to the company secretary representing Arvind Textiles Ltd, and the answer wou…
- Aarogya Seva Ltd, a Section 8 company, missed the sixty-day period for appealing a Company Law Board order, being prevented by sufficient ca…