Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Vasicek and Gauss+ Models

A trading desk wants a model that reproduces today's observed market zero-coupon bond prices exactly at every maturity. A quant proposes a Vasicek model with constant k, θ and σ. Which statement is correct?

Constant-parameter Vasicek cannot match an arbitrary market curve exactly because it has only a few parameters. Fitting the whole initial term structure requires a time-dependent drift, as in Ho-Lee or Hull-White, so a plain Vasicek model gives only an approximate fit.

  1. AWith constant parameters, the Vasicek curve has too few degrees of freedom to fit an arbitrary market curve exactly; a time-dependent θ(t) would be neededCorrect
  2. BConstant-parameter Vasicek fits any market curve exactly because the bond price formula is affine in r
  3. CVasicek fits the curve exactly once the short rate r0 is set equal to the longest-maturity market yield
  4. DVasicek fits the curve exactly if σ is calibrated separately for each maturity

Explanation

Vasicek with constant parameters has only a handful of inputs (r0, k, θ, σ), so it can fit only a limited family of curve shapes. Models like Ho-Lee and Hull-White use a time-dependent drift to match the initial curve. An affine price formula does not guarantee a fit. Setting r0 to the long yield or varying σ by maturity is not a valid calibration of this model.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on The Vasicek and Gauss+ Models shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More The Vasicek and Gauss+ Models questions