FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Monitoring Liquidity
A treasury team monitors the share of its funding that comes from its five largest wholesale counterparties. Total funding is USD 2,000 million and the five largest providers supply USD 700 million. A new internal limit is 30%. What is the correct assessment?
Concentration is 35 percent, which breaches the 30 percent limit. It is 700 million divided by total funding of 2,000 million. The treasury should diversify funding sources or tighten limits on the largest providers. Using a wrong denominator can wrongly suggest compliance.
- AConcentration is 35%, which breaches the limitCorrect
- BConcentration is 28.6%, within the limit
- CConcentration is 35%, within the limit
- DConcentration is 70%, which breaches the limit
Explanation
Concentration = 700/2,000 = 35%, above the 30% limit, so there is a breach. The 28.6% figure arises from dividing by 2,450, using the wrong base.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Monitoring Liquidity shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Monitoring Liquidity questions
- A bank reports the following contractual cash flows (USD million) for the 0-30 day bucket: asset inflows of 480 and liability outflows of 62…
- A treasurer projects cash flows for the next 30 days. Contractual inflows are USD 500 million and contractual outflows are USD 620 million. …
- Which of the following is an example of a contingent source of liquidity risk, as opposed to a risk from contractual cash flows?
- A liquidity risk manager reviews a gap report showing a large negative cumulative gap in the 0-7 day bucket but a large positive cumulative …
- A bank's cumulative net payment position (receipts minus payments, in USD million) at four checkpoints on a day is: 10:00 = -40; 12:00 = -11…
- A bank's available stable funding is USD 540 million. Its required stable funding is: USD 400 million of loans at 85% factor, USD 100 millio…