Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis · Maximum likelihood estimators for transition intensities

A two-state model with constant μ is fitted to data with D deaths. The observed data for each life i consist of the time θ_i observed and an indicator d_i of death (1) or censoring (0). Which statement about the likelihood and the estimator is correct?

A censored life contributes only the survival probability exp(-μθ_i) to the likelihood. Its observed time is added to the total waiting time V, but it does not count as a death in D. Ignoring censored lives would overstate the force of mortality.

  1. ACensored lives contribute exp(-μθ_i) to the likelihood and their time is included in V, but they do not add to DCorrect
  2. BCensored lives are excluded from both D and V
  3. CCensored lives contribute μ·exp(-μθ_i) to the likelihood
  4. DCensored lives add to D but not to V
  5. The MLE equals the mean of θ_i over all lives

Explanation

The likelihood is the product of μ^d_i · exp(-μθ_i). A censored life has d_i=0, so contributes only the survival factor exp(-μθ_i). Its time enters V but it adds nothing to D. Excluding censored lives would bias μ̂ upwards.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Maximum likelihood estimators for transition intensities shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Maximum likelihood estimators for transition intensities questions