IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis · Maximum likelihood estimators for transition intensities
An Indian insurer observes 500 lives in a two-state model with constant μ. The total waiting time is 2,000 years and there are 100 deaths. Using the asymptotic variance μ̂/V, what is the approximate 95% confidence interval for μ (using 1.96)?
The interval is 0.0402 to 0.0598. The estimate is 100/2000 = 0.05, the standard error is the square root of 0.05/2000 = 0.005, and 1.96 times this gives a margin of 0.0098 either side.
- A0.0402 to 0.0598Correct
- B0.0500 to 0.0598
- C0.0304 to 0.0696
- D0.0402 to 0.0696
- 0.0250 to 0.0750
Explanation
μ̂ = 100/2000 = 0.05. Variance = μ̂/V = 0.05/2000 = 0.000025, so the standard deviation is 0.005. The margin is 1.96 x 0.005 = 0.0098. The interval is 0.0402 to 0.0598. Using 500 lives as the exposure would give a wrong width.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Maximum likelihood estimators for transition intensities shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Maximum likelihood estimators for transition intensities questions
- A three-state model has states H (healthy), S (sick) and D (dead) with constant transition intensities. Over the study, the total time spent…
- A two-state model with constant μ is fitted to data with D deaths. The observed data for each life i consist of the time θ_i observed and an…
- In a two-state alive-dead model with a constant force of mortality μ, the data show d deaths and a total time spent alive (central exposed t…
- In a two-decrement model (alive to dead by cause 1 or cause 2), 500 life-years of exposure produced 15 deaths from cause 1 and 10 from cause…
- In the two-state alive-dead model with constant force of mortality μ, observations are made on lives over a period. Let D be the number of d…
- Which statement about the MLE μ-hat = D/V for a constant force of mortality is correct?