IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Actuarial Mathematics for Modelling · Non-unit reserves for unit-linked contracts (zeroisation)
A unit-linked policy issued by an Indian insurer has an annual premium of Rs 20,000 at the start of each year. The allocation is 80% of premium in year 1 and 100% thereafter. Expenses at the start of year 1 are Rs 6,000 and nil afterwards. Ignoring all other items, what is the non-unit cash flow at the start of year 1 (before any reserve)?
The non-unit cash flow is Rs -2,000. Twenty per cent of the Rs 20,000 premium, Rs 4,000, is not allocated to units and is income to the insurer, and expenses of Rs 6,000 are deducted, leaving a negative cash flow of Rs 2,000.
- ARs -6,000
- BRs -2,000Correct
- CRs 4,000
- DRs -10,000
- Rs 2,000
Explanation
Unallocated premium = 20% of 20,000 = 4,000. Non-unit cash flow = 4,000 - 6,000 = -2,000. Rs -6,000 ignores the unallocated premium, Rs 4,000 ignores expenses, Rs -10,000 subtracts 4,000 instead of adding it, and Rs 2,000 reverses the sign.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Non-unit reserves for unit-linked contracts (zeroisation) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Non-unit reserves for unit-linked contracts (zeroisation) questions
- In the zeroisation method for the non-unit reserves of a unit-linked contract, which statement correctly describes how the reserves are set?
- A unit-linked policy is being reserved by zeroisation. Which description of the non-unit reserve at the end of year t is correct?
- A three-year unit-linked policy has a non-unit cashflow at the end of year 3 of -Rs 210 per policy, and no decrements are assumed. Non-unit …
- Which statement correctly describes how non-unit reserves are set using the zeroisation method?
- Non-unit cash flows (per policy in force at the start of each year, before reserves) are: time 0: -2,000; time 1: +900; time 2: +1,500. A si…
- Which statement about setting non-unit reserves by zeroisation for a unit-linked contract is correct?