Skip to content

FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Regression Diagnostics

An analyst regresses monthly excess returns of a fund on a market factor using time-series data. A plot of the residuals shows long runs of positive residuals followed by long runs of negative residuals. Which conclusion is most consistent with this pattern?

Long runs of same-signed residuals signal positive serial correlation. OLS coefficient estimates stay unbiased, but the usual standard errors tend to be understated, which makes t-statistics too large and significance tests overly optimistic.

  1. ANegative serial correlation in the residuals, so OLS slope estimates are biased
  2. BPositive serial correlation in the residuals, so OLS standard errors are likely understatedCorrect
  3. CHeteroskedasticity only, so the slope estimates are inconsistent
  4. DPerfect multicollinearity among the regressors

Explanation

Long runs of same-signed residuals indicate positive first-order serial correlation. With positive autocorrelation, conventional OLS standard errors are typically too small, inflating t-statistics. Slopes remain unbiased (if regressors are exogenous), so the bias claim is wrong.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Regression Diagnostics shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Regression Diagnostics questions