Skip to content

NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-V-A: Mutual Fund Distributors · Risk, Return and Performance of Funds

An equity fund returned 12% in a year. Its benchmark returned 10%, and the fund's beta against the benchmark is 1.0 over the same period. Which statement is most appropriate about the fund's performance?

The fund delivered a positive excess return of 2 percentage points, since 12% minus 10% equals 2%. A beta of 1.0 only indicates that the fund moves in line with the benchmark. It does not mean zero risk or zero tracking error.

  1. AThe fund generated a positive excess return of 2 percentage points over the benchmarkCorrect
  2. BThe fund underperformed because its return is not a multiple of the benchmark return
  3. CThe fund's tracking error must be zero because beta is 1.0
  4. DThe fund carries no risk because beta is 1.0

Explanation

Excess return is fund return minus benchmark return, which is 12% - 10% = 2 percentage points. Beta of 1.0 shows market-like sensitivity, not zero tracking error or zero risk. Tracking error depends on the variability of the return difference, which beta does not reveal.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk, Return and Performance of Funds shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk, Return and Performance of Funds questions