CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Demands and Recovery
An Input Service Distributor of Zenith Ltd. distributed credit in contravention of section 20, resulting in excess credit to two branch recipients. Under section 21 of the CGST Act, how is the excess recovered?
The excess credit is recovered from the recipients who received it, along with interest, and the determination of the amount follows section 73 or section 74 or section 74A as applicable, mutatis mutandis, as section 21 provides.
- AOnly from the Input Service Distributor, with no recovery from recipients
- BFrom the recipients of the excess credit along with interest, with section 73 or 74 or 74A applying as the case may be for determining the amountCorrect
- CFrom the recipients without interest, as interest applies only to the distributor
- DBy cancelling the registration of the recipients, with no determination of the amount
Explanation
Section 21 provides that excess credit distributed in contravention of section 20 is recovered from the recipients along with interest. Section 73 or section 74 or section 74A, as the case may be, applies mutatis mutandis to determine the amount. Recovery solely from the distributor or without interest is contrary to the text.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Demands and Recovery shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Demands and Recovery questions
- An Input Service Distributor of Arjun Group distributed credit in contravention of section 20, so that Ruchi Ltd, one of the recipients, rec…
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd. was served an order under section 78 of the CGST Act requiring payment of a demand. The order was served on 10 June. …
- Rao Pharma has a section 73(9) order for 2019-20 and also a pending demand of Rs 3,00,000 that arose from an erroneous refund granted to it.…
- Tara Distributors, an Input Service Distributor, distributed credit in contravention of section 20 and so excess credit went to two recipien…
- Mehta Traders received an order under section 73 demanding tax, which was served on 10 June. The order does not state any shorter payment pe…
- Kaveri Textiles was served a notice of demand of Rs 8,00,000 and filed an appeal. The appellate proceedings enhanced the Government dues by …