CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Law relating to Foreign Contribution Regulation
An inspecting officer examines the account books of a registered NGO under the FCRA, 2010 and has reasonable cause to believe that a provision of the Act has been contravened. He seizes the books. The Central Government brings no proceeding for that contravention. After what period must the books be returned to the NGO?
The seized account or record must be returned if no proceeding for the contravention it discloses is brought within six months from the date of seizure. This is the limit set by Section 24 of the FCRA, 2010, so the NGO can demand its books back after six months.
- AThree months from the date of seizure
- BSix months from the date of seizureCorrect
- COne year from the date of seizure
- DTwo years from the date of seizure
Explanation
Under Section 24, the account or record seized must be returned to the person from whom it was seized if no proceeding is brought within six months from the date of seizure for the contravention disclosed by it. Three months and one year are not the statutory periods.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law relating to Foreign Contribution Regulation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law relating to Foreign Contribution Regulation questions
- Vidya Foundation holds an FCRA certificate and has opened a second FCRA Account in a scheduled bank of its choice to utilise funds. A truste…
- Under section 9 of the FCRA, 2010, the Central Government may prohibit a person not specified in section 3 from accepting foreign contributi…
- The FCRA certificate of Nirmal Seva Society is cancelled because it made a false statement in its renewal application. After cancellation, f…
- Rohan, an Indian citizen working in Dubai, receives a donation from a foreign friend and passes it on to a political body in India. His lawy…
- Hope Foundation, which held an FCRA certificate and built a school building and bought equipment from foreign contribution, has become defun…
- Arvind was convicted under section 35 for an offence relating to acceptance of foreign contribution. He was again convicted of such an offen…