Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities

An investment firm's compliance officer reviews a sales process in which advisers recommend a complex structured note to elderly clients with low risk tolerance, because the product pays the firm a high commission. Which compliance risk is most directly illustrated?

The scenario illustrates mis-selling risk driven by a conflict of interest. Advisers recommend a complex product unsuited to low-risk-tolerance elderly clients because of commissions, breaching suitability and fair-treatment duties, which exposes the firm to regulatory sanctions, client compensation and reputational damage.

  1. ASettlement risk from delayed trade confirmation
  2. BMis-selling risk arising from a conflict of interest and unsuitable adviceCorrect
  3. CModel risk from an inaccurate pricing function
  4. DLiquidity risk from a mismatch of funding maturities

Explanation

Recommending a product that does not match client risk tolerance because of commission incentives is a conflict of interest producing unsuitable advice, i.e. mis-selling. Settlement, model and funding risks are not the issue described.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities questions