Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities

An investment firm's employee receives a tip from a company insider about an unannounced acquisition and buys shares in a personal account. Which compliance control would most directly have prevented this trade?

A pre-clearance requirement combined with a restricted list for personal trading would most directly prevent the trade. It lets compliance block employee transactions in securities where material non-public information may exist, unlike NAV reconciliations, liquidity stress tests or suitability questionnaires.

  1. AA pre-clearance requirement and restricted list for employee personal tradingCorrect
  2. BA quarterly NAV reconciliation
  3. CA stress test of liquidity coverage
  4. DA client suitability questionnaire

Explanation

Pre-clearance of personal trades and restricted lists block employees from trading securities where material non-public information may exist. NAV reconciliation, liquidity stress tests and suitability questionnaires address other risks.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Case Study: Investor Protection and Compliance Risks in Investment Activities questions