CS Executive · Setting Up of Business, Industrial and Labour Laws · Limited Liability Partnership
Anita Associates LLP failed to file a return required under the LLP Act, and a penalty was imposed on the LLP. The LLP agreement does not mention who handles filings. Anita is a designated partner, Bhuvan is an ordinary partner, and no provision of the Act expressly provides otherwise. Who is liable to the penalty imposed on the LLP for this contravention, in addition to the LLP?
Anita, the designated partner, is liable along with the LLP. Under Section 8, unless the Act expressly provides otherwise, a designated partner is responsible for compliance and filings and is liable to all penalties imposed on the LLP for contravention of the Act's provisions.
- AOnly Bhuvan, since ordinary partners handle operations
- BAnita as designated partner, being liable to all penalties imposed on the LLP for contravention of the ActCorrect
- CNo partner, since only the LLP can be penalised
- DOnly the Registrar who accepted the earlier filings
Explanation
Section 8 states that unless the Act expressly provides otherwise, a designated partner is responsible for compliance acts, including filing returns, and is liable to all penalties imposed on the LLP for contravention of those provisions. Anita is therefore liable. Bhuvan, an ordinary partner, is not made liable by Section 8, though Section 76 can reach partners where there is consent, connivance or neglect, which is not stated here.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Limited Liability Partnership shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Limited Liability Partnership questions
- Section 63 of the LLP Act, 2008 deals with how a limited liability partnership may be wound up. Which statement matches it?
- Alpha LLP and Beta LLP are being amalgamated under a Tribunal-sanctioned scheme. Beta LLP, a transferor, is to be dissolved without winding …
- Anita, who is not a partner in Kaveri Designs LLP, allows a vendor to believe she is a partner. Relying on this, the vendor supplies goods o…
- Ravi, a partner of Nilgiri Foods LLP, has no authority to sign supply contracts. He signs a bulk purchase contract with a supplier who knows…
- Rohan, an individual, is appointed a designated partner of Vihaan Services LLP on 1 June. Which statement is correct under the LLP Act?
- Mehta & Sons, a partnership firm in Surat, wants to become an LLP. Under the LLP Act, 2008, which Schedule governs the conversion of a firm …