IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis · Introduction to extreme value theory
Annual maximum flood losses at a site are modelled by a GEV distribution with μ = 100, σ = 20 and ξ = 0 (Gumbel), in Rs crore. What is the probability that next year's maximum loss exceeds 140?
The standardised value is (140-100)/20 = 2, so the Gumbel distribution function is exp(-e^(-2)) ≈ 0.873. The probability of exceeding 140 is the complement, about 0.127. Giving 0.873 would confuse the non-exceedance probability with the exceedance probability.
- A1 - exp(-e^(-2)) ≈ 0.127Correct
- Bexp(-e^(-2)) ≈ 0.873
- C1 - exp(-e^(2)) ≈ 1.000
- Dexp(-e^(-0.5)) ≈ 0.545
- 1 - exp(-e^(-0.5)) ≈ 0.455
Explanation
For Gumbel, G(x) = exp(-exp(-(x-μ)/σ)). Here (140-100)/20 = 2, so G(140) = exp(-e^(-2)) = exp(-0.13534) ≈ 0.8734. The exceedance probability is 1 - 0.8734 ≈ 0.127. Option B is the non-exceedance probability, a wrong-tail error.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Introduction to extreme value theory shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Introduction to extreme value theory questions
- Using the same GPD tail model (threshold u, shape ξ with 0 < ξ < 1, scale β), the expected shortfall at level p is ES_p = VaR_p/(1 − ξ) + (β…
- The Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) distribution has distribution function G(x) = exp{-[1 + ξ((x-μ)/σ)]^(-1/ξ)} for ξ ≠ 0. Which sign of the…
- When choosing the threshold u in a POT analysis, what is the main trade-off?
- In the peaks-over-threshold method, an analyst chooses a threshold that is set too low. What is the most likely consequence?
- X1, ..., Xn are independent Exponential variables with rate 1, and Mn is their maximum. Which statement about the limiting behaviour of Mn -…
- An analyst fits a generalised Pareto distribution (GPD) to exceedances over a threshold u using maximum likelihood. Which of the following b…