Skip to content

CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Protection of Trade Secrets

Arjun independently develops a recipe identical to the confidential recipe of Spice Route Foods, without any access to or knowledge of it. Spice Route Foods sues him for misappropriation. What is the likely outcome?

Arjun is not liable. Trade secret law protects against breach of confidence or wrongful acquisition, not independent discovery. Since Arjun had no access to the recipe and developed it himself, there is no misappropriation, and trade secrets give no monopoly against independent creators.

  1. AArjun is liable, because identical information is always misappropriation
  2. BArjun is not liable, because independent discovery is not a breach of confidence or misappropriationCorrect
  3. CArjun is liable, but only for nominal damages
  4. DArjun must assign the recipe to Spice Route Foods

Explanation

Trade secret protection guards against improper acquisition, use or disclosure, not against independent development or reverse engineering by fair means. Without a confidential relationship or wrongful access, no breach of confidence arises. Holding him liable would give an exclusive monopoly like a patent, which trade secrets do not give.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Protection of Trade Secrets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Protection of Trade SecretsFree diagnostic mock

More Protection of Trade Secrets questions