Skip to content

CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - Principles and Practice · Stakeholders Rights

Arjun Industries Ltd has equity shares and 8% preference shares, and its articles allow variation of class rights. It plans a variation of the preference shareholders' rights that also adversely affects equity shareholders. Preference holders of 76% of the issued preference shares consent in writing. Holders of 12% of the preference shares did not consent. Which is correct?

Three-fourths consent of the affected equity class is also needed, and the dissenting 12% preference holders, being at least ten per cent, may apply to the Tribunal within twenty-one days. Until the Tribunal confirms it, the variation does not take effect.

  1. AThe variation is valid as soon as 76% of preference holders consent, and dissenters have no remedy
  2. BEquity shareholders' consent of three-fourths is also required, and the dissenting 12% may apply to the Tribunal within twenty-one daysCorrect
  3. COnly a simple majority of equity shareholders is required in addition, and the dissenters may apply within thirty days
  4. DTribunal approval is always required before any variation, whatever the level of dissent

Explanation

Section 48(1) proviso requires three-fourths consent of the other affected class as well. Under section 48(2), holders of at least ten per cent who did not consent may apply to the Tribunal within twenty-one days, and the variation does not take effect until confirmed. Here 12% exceeds the 10% threshold.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Stakeholders Rights shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Stakeholders Rights questions