ACCA Applied Knowledge · Management Accounting · Accounting for material, labour and overheads
Budgeted overheads for a department were $270,000 based on 45,000 direct labour hours. Actual overheads were $281,000 and actual hours were 44,000. Which statement is correct?
The absorption rate is $6 per labour hour from the budget. Actual hours of 44,000 absorb $264,000, while actual overheads were $281,000. The shortfall means overheads were under-absorbed by $17,000, caused by higher spending and lower activity than budgeted.
- AOverheads were under-absorbed by $17,000Correct
- BOverheads were under-absorbed by $11,000
- COverheads were over-absorbed by $17,000
- DOverheads were under-absorbed by $6,000
Explanation
Rate = $270,000 / 45,000 = $6 per hour. Absorbed = 44,000 x $6 = $264,000. Actual $281,000 - $264,000 = $17,000 under-absorbed. The $11,000 figure compares actual with budget only.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Accounting for material, labour and overheads shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Accounting for material, labour and overheads questions
- Dunmore Co has two service departments, Maintenance (M) and Canteen (C), and two production departments, X and Y. Overheads before service a…
- A company operates a group bonus scheme where time saved is rewarded. The standard time for a job is 50 hours and the job was completed in 4…
- Which of the following is the correct accounting treatment at the end of the period when production overheads have been over-absorbed?
- Which of the following would most likely cause overheads to be under-absorbed in a period?
- Dalmore Ltd had opening inventory of 200 units at $8. It bought 300 units at $9 and later 500 units at $10. It sold 600 units for $15 each. …
- Budgeted fixed production overhead is $120,000 and budgeted production is 20,000 units. In a month, production was 18,000 units and sales we…