CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence · Values, Ethics and Professional Conduct
CS Meera Iyer, a practising Company Secretary, is the subject of a complaint alleging a lapse that is not listed in any Schedule to the Company Secretaries Act, 1980. Her counsel argues that the Director (Discipline) cannot inquire because the act is not in any Schedule. Which view is correct under Section 22?
The Director (Discipline) can still inquire. Section 22 says misconduct includes acts or omissions listed in the Schedules, but it does not limit or abridge the Director's power under Section 21(1) to inquire into a member's conduct in other circumstances.
- AThe Director (Discipline) can still inquire, because Section 22 does not limit the power to inquire into a member's conduct under other circumstancesCorrect
- BThe Director (Discipline) must close the complaint, because only Scheduled acts can ever be misconduct
- CThe complaint can proceed only if the Central Government nominees approve it
- DThe complaint can proceed only if the member admits the lapse in writing
Explanation
Section 22 provides that professional or other misconduct includes any act or omission in the Schedules. It adds that nothing in the section limits the Director (Discipline)'s power under Section 21(1) to inquire into a member's conduct under other circumstances. So the argument fails.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Values, Ethics and Professional Conduct shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Values, Ethics and Professional Conduct questions
- During an inquiry into CS Vikram Sethi, the Disciplinary Committee wants an officer of a bank to attend and produce account records. What po…
- The Institute of Company Secretaries of India receives a proposal to start a new certificate course. Under the Company Secretaries Act, 1980…
- Neha Bansal, a young Company Secretary, argues that ethical standards are unnecessary because the Company Secretaries Act already punishes w…
- Gupta & Associates, a firm of Company Secretaries, issued a misleading certificate for Lotus Textiles Ltd. An inquiry finds the firm's partn…
- The Disciplinary Committee orders removal of CS Kavita Shah's name from the Register for two years. The order is communicated to her on 1 Ma…
- A client argues that a CS cannot be inquired against for a lapse because the lapse is not listed in any Schedule to the Company Secretaries …