FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Monitoring Liquidity
During a period of stress, a bank's LCR falls below 100%. According to the Basel III framework, how should this be interpreted?
Basel III intends the HQLA buffer to be drawn on in stress, so an LCR temporarily below 100% is acceptable. The bank should engage its supervisor, who assesses the circumstances and appropriate action, rather than the bank hoarding HQLA or facing automatic closure.
- AThe bank must immediately be closed by its supervisor
- BThe bank may use its HQLA stock to meet outflows, even if the ratio temporarily falls below 100%, and should discuss with its supervisorCorrect
- CThe bank must stop using HQLA to preserve the ratio
- DThe bank must raise its minimum ratio to 120%
Explanation
The HQLA stock is intended to be used in stress, so the ratio may fall below 100% while the bank deals with outflows. The supervisor assesses the situation and the remedial actions; it does not require automatic closure or hoarding of HQLA.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Monitoring Liquidity shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Monitoring Liquidity questions
- In a liquidity stress test, a bank assumes a 30-day horizon with deposit outflows, loss of secured funding and draws on committed credit lin…
- A bank has high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) of USD 90 million. Projected 30-day stressed cash outflows are USD 160 million and stressed inf…
- Which feature most clearly explains why liquidity risk can be self-reinforcing in a market-wide stress?
- A bank reports the following contractual cash flows (USD million) for the 0-30 day bucket: asset inflows of 480 and liability outflows of 62…
- A treasurer projects cash flows for the next 30 days. Contractual inflows are USD 500 million and contractual outflows are USD 620 million. …
- Which of the following is an example of a contingent source of liquidity risk, as opposed to a risk from contractual cash flows?