Skip to content

CS Professional · Internal and Forensic Audit · Reporting under Internal Audit

During coordination, Meera, an internal auditor at Bharat Logistics Ltd, tells the external auditor that she suspects a purchase manager has been colluding with a vendor. How does SA 610 (Revised) suggest the external auditor should treat this communication?

The external auditor should take the information into account when identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement due to fraud under SA 240. Such communication helps alert the auditor to matters affecting the audit, but the judgment on risk remains the external auditor's own.

  1. AIgnore it, as fraud suspicion is outside the external auditor's scope
  2. BTake it into account when identifying the risks of material misstatement due to fraud under SA 240Correct
  3. CHand over the assessment of fraud risk to the internal auditor entirely
  4. DWithdraw from using any work of the internal audit function

Explanation

The text says communication with the internal audit function may bring matters to the external auditor's attention, and information on actual, suspected or alleged fraud can be taken into account in identifying fraud risks per SA 240. Assessing risk is a significant judgment that cannot be delegated.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Reporting under Internal Audit shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Reporting under Internal Audit questions