ACCA Applied Skills · Corporate and Business Law (Global) · Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both
Fenmark Ltd agreed to sell 200 crates of components to Gale Corp for delivery by carrier. Fenmark handed the goods to the carrier but did not mark them or send any shipping document identifying them to the contract. The goods, together with other consignments, were lost in transit. Under the CISG, what is the position on risk?
Risk stayed with Fenmark. Under the CISG, risk does not pass to the buyer until the goods are clearly identified to the contract by markings, shipping documents or notice. Without identification, handing goods to the carrier is not enough to transfer risk.
- ARisk passed to Gale on handing over to the carrier, because identification is irrelevant
- BRisk remained with Fenmark because risk does not pass until the goods are clearly identified to the contractCorrect
- CRisk passed to Gale when the contract was concluded
- DRisk is shared equally because the goods were lost with others
Explanation
Even where risk would otherwise pass on handover to the carrier, it does not pass until the goods are clearly identified to the contract, for example by markings, shipping documents or notice to the buyer. Fenmark did none of these, so the loss falls on Fenmark. Sharing the loss is not a CISG rule.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both questions
- Under the CISG, a buyer, Kestrel Co, was required to collect goods from the seller's warehouse on 1 March. Kestrel Co failed to collect them…
- Gantry Ltd sells a consignment of components to Hallam Co under the CISG. Hallam's goods arrive on 1 March with a visible shortfall in quant…
- Delta Ltd sells 200 tonnes of grain to Evo Co under the CISG. The contract states no place of delivery and does not involve carriage of the …
- Under a CISG contract, Brasa Ltd (buyer) rejects goods lawfully delivered to its warehouse because they do not conform with the contract. Th…
- Corvo Ltd agreed under a CISG contract to buy 12 monthly deliveries of components from Delmar SA. After the first delivery, Corvo discovers …
- Under a CISG contract, Kestrel Co delivered goods and Dunmore Co failed to pay the price of 80,000 on the due date of 1 March. Dunmore paid …