ACCA Applied Skills · Corporate and Business Law (Global) · Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both
Under a CISG contract, Brasa Ltd (buyer) rejects goods lawfully delivered to its warehouse because they do not conform with the contract. The seller has no agent at the destination. Which statement best describes Brasa's duty regarding the rejected goods?
Brasa must take reasonable steps to preserve the rejected goods and can recover its reasonable expenses from the seller. Rejection does not remove the duty of care, and selling is permitted only in limited cases such as perishable goods or unreasonable delay.
- AIt must take reasonable steps to preserve them, and may recover reasonable expenses from the sellerCorrect
- BIt may leave them unprotected, because rejection ends all its obligations
- CIt must sell them immediately at any price and keep the proceeds for itself
Explanation
A buyer in possession of goods it intends to reject must take reasonable steps to preserve them and is entitled to retain them until reimbursed by the seller for reasonable expenses. Rejection does not end this duty. A sale is allowed only in limited cases, such as perishability or unreasonable delay, and the proceeds are not kept for the buyer's own benefit.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both questions
- Fenmark Ltd agreed to sell 200 crates of components to Gale Corp for delivery by carrier. Fenmark handed the goods to the carrier but did no…
- Jarvis Foods sold a consignment of fresh fruit to Kestrel Ltd under the CISG. Kestrel rightly rejects the fruit, which is subject to rapid d…
- Under a CISG contract, Gamma SA delivers goods that do not conform to the contract. Delta Co, the buyer, examined them promptly but then wai…
- Under a CISG contract, Carvet Ltd sold goods to Mendo Co. Mendo avoided the contract for a fundamental breach and must return the goods. Bef…
- Vantor Ltd, a seller, failed to deliver on time because its own supplier, a third party hired to produce a component, defaulted. The supplie…
- Gantry Ltd sold goods to Holm SA under the CISG. Holm's market for the goods then collapsed and Holm refused to accept delivery, wrongly. Ga…