ACCA Applied Skills · Corporate and Business Law (Global) · Introduction to the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and ICC Incoterms
Galdor Ltd (State G) emails Hanse GmbH (State H), both CISG contracting states, an offer to sell goods, stating the offer lapses in five days. The email was sent at 10:00 on Monday. Hanse sends a late acceptance that reaches Galdor on Saturday. Galdor immediately tells Hanse by email, on Saturday, that it treats the acceptance as effective. What is the position under the CISG?
A contract exists. Under the CISG a late acceptance remains effective if the offeror, without delay, tells the offeree or sends notice that it treats the acceptance as effective. Galdor did this on the day it received the acceptance.
- ANo contract, because a late acceptance is always ineffective
- BA contract exists, because the offeror promptly informed the offeree that the late acceptance is effectiveCorrect
- CA contract exists only if Hanse had relied on the offer
- DNo contract unless the acceptance is confirmed in writing signed by both parties
Explanation
Under the CISG a late acceptance is still effective as an acceptance if the offeror without delay orally informs the offeree to that effect or dispatches a notice to that effect. Galdor did so on the day it received it. Saying a late acceptance is always ineffective ignores this rule.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Introduction to the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and ICC Incoterms shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Introduction to the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and ICC Incoterms questions
- Orla Ltd (Ireland) sells goods to Mekong Trading (Vietnam) on DAP Ho Chi Minh City warehouse terms (Incoterms 2020). The goods arrive on the…
- Under the structure of Incoterms 2020, each rule sets out the obligations of the seller and the buyer in ten parallel articles, A1 to A10 an…
- Zenith Ltd in Country A agrees to sell machinery to Borra Co in Country B on a contract that states only 'FCA Zenith's factory, Incoterms 20…
- Norvik Ltd agreed to sell 10 identical machines to Taska Inc under the CISG, delivery in one lot. Norvik delivered the machines on time, but…
- Orla Ltd (seller) delivered goods to Pavo Co under a CISG contract. On inspecting them, Pavo discovered a defect in quality that Orla could …
- Aroha Ltd in New Zealand agrees to sell machinery to Berg GmbH in Germany. The contract states only 'delivery terms: FOB Auckland, Incoterms…