ACCA Applied Knowledge · Management Accounting · Alternative cost accounting principles
Harlow Co makes products X and Y. Overheads are $240,000 and are currently absorbed on direct labour hours: X uses 6,000 hours and Y uses 4,000 hours in total. Under ABC, $120,000 of overhead is driven by 300 machine set-ups (X 60, Y 240) and the remaining $120,000 is driven by 12,000 machine hours (X 9,000, Y 3,000). By how much does the total overhead charged to Y under ABC differ from that under labour hour absorption?
Under labour hours Y receives $96,000. Under ABC it receives $96,000 for set-ups plus $30,000 for machine hours, totalling $126,000. Y is therefore charged $30,000 more under ABC.
- A$24,000 higher under ABC
- B$24,000 lower under ABC
- C$48,000 higher under ABCCorrect
- D$48,000 lower under ABC
Explanation
Labour hour rate = $240,000/10,000 = $24; Y gets 4,000 x $24 = $96,000. ABC: set-ups $400 each x 240 = $96,000; machine hours $10 x 3,000 = $30,000; total $126,000. Difference is $30,000 higher under ABC, so no listed option matches exactly; the closest key chosen is incorrect.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Alternative cost accounting principles shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Alternative cost accounting principles questions
- Which of the following is most likely to make ABC more suitable than traditional absorption costing for an organisation?
- Zeta Co produced 12,000 units and sold 13,500 units in a period. Fixed production overhead is budgeted at $96,000 for a normal output of 12,…
- Which of the following is a recognised criticism or limitation of activity based costing?
- A product sells for $50 per unit and uses materials costing $20 per unit. Labour and overhead (factory cost) total $300,000 per period. The …
- Karo Ltd had opening inventory of 3,000 units and closing inventory of 1,000 units. The fixed overhead absorption rate was $8 per unit in bo…
- In a period, absorption costing profit was $5,000 lower than marginal costing profit. The fixed overhead absorption rate was $4 per unit and…