CS Professional · CSR and Social Governance · Guidelines on CSR
Himalaya Cements Ltd was required to spend Rs 1 crore on CSR in the current year but spent Rs 1.4 crore. Which statement is correct regarding the excess Rs 40 lakh?
The excess Rs 40 lakh may be set off against the CSR spending requirement of succeeding financial years, for such number of years and in such manner as prescribed, as the third proviso to section 135(5) permits.
- AIt is lost and cannot be used again
- BIt must be refunded to the Board as reserve
- CIt may be set off against the CSR requirement of succeeding financial years in the prescribed mannerCorrect
- DIt must be transferred to a Schedule VII Fund
Explanation
The third proviso to section 135(5) allows a company that spends more than required to set off the excess against the requirement for such number of succeeding years and in such manner as prescribed. It does not have to be transferred to a Fund or be forfeited.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Guidelines on CSR shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Guidelines on CSR questions
- A research team prepares a timeline of Indian CSR guidelines and regulation. Which chronological order, earliest to latest, is correct?
- Kaveri Engineering Ltd has an unspent CSR amount of Rs 40 lakh relating to an ongoing project for FY 2026-27. By when must it be moved to th…
- Meghna Textiles Ltd, a company with a CSR obligation, has not spent its full 2% amount for the year. None of the unspent amount relates to a…
- Narmada Foods Ltd's CSR obligation for the year works out to Rs 45 lakh. Which statement about its CSR governance is correct under section 1…
- Meera, a trainee, writes in her note that the Ministry of Corporate Affairs' CSR Voluntary Guidelines of 2009 required every company to spen…
- Kaveri Pharma Ltd, a private company, has for the immediately preceding financial year a net worth of Rs 300 crore, turnover of Rs 600 crore…