ACCA Applied Skills · Financial Reporting · The concepts and principles of groups and consolidated financial statements
Hold Co owns 75% of Sub Co. During the year Hold Co sold goods to Sub Co for $80,000, at a mark-up of 25% on cost. At the year end, Sub Co still held half of these goods. What is the unrealised profit adjustment to eliminate in the consolidated statement of financial position?
The unrealised profit is $8,000. Half of the $80,000 goods remain, worth $40,000 at transfer price, and with a 25% mark-up on cost the profit is 25/125 of that amount, which is $8,000.
- A$8,000Correct
- B$16,000
- C$6,400
- D$10,000
Explanation
Goods still held at transfer price = 40,000. Profit in them = 40,000 x 25/125 = 8,000. Using 25/100 gives 10,000, which wrongly treats the mark-up as a margin on sales. Using the full 80,000 sales gives 16,000, ignoring that half was sold on.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The concepts and principles of groups and consolidated financial statements shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The concepts and principles of groups and consolidated financial statements questions
- Which of the following is the most likely indicator of significant influence over an investee under IAS 28?
- On the acquisition date, Sub Co owned land with a carrying amount of $200,000 and a fair value of $260,000. Parent Co acquired 60% of Sub Co…
- Parent Co acquired 70% of Sub Co on 1 April when Sub Co's retained earnings were $120,000. Share capital is $100,000 throughout. At 31 March…
- Parent Co owns 80% of Sub Co, acquired several years ago. During the year Parent Co sold goods to Sub Co for $120,000, making a profit of 25…
- Alpha acquires 30% of the equity shares of Beta and can exercise significant influence over it. Alpha has no control over Beta. In Alpha's c…
- Cedar acquired 25% of Birch on 1 July 20X1 for $600,000. Birch's profit after tax for the year ended 31 December 20X1 was $240,000, accruing…