ACCA Applied Skills · Financial Reporting · The concepts and principles of groups and consolidated financial statements
On the acquisition date, Sub Co owned land with a carrying amount of $200,000 and a fair value of $260,000. Parent Co acquired 60% of Sub Co. NCI is measured at the proportionate share of net assets. Which statement about the consolidation is correct?
Land is consolidated at fair value, with the full $60,000 uplift added to net assets at acquisition. This reduces goodwill and increases NCI. IFRS 3 requires fair value measurement of identifiable assets, and 100% of the subsidiary's assets are consolidated.
- AThe fair value uplift of $60,000 is included in net assets at acquisition, reducing goodwill, and land is consolidated at fair valueCorrect
- BThe uplift is ignored because Sub Co's own financial statements carry land at cost
- COnly 60% of the uplift, $36,000, is added to land in the consolidated statement
- DThe uplift is credited directly to Parent Co's retained earnings
Explanation
IFRS 3 requires identifiable assets to be measured at fair value at acquisition, so the full 60,000 uplift is added to land and to net assets at acquisition. Goodwill is reduced and NCI includes its share. Adding only 60% is wrong because the group consolidates 100% of assets and liabilities.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The concepts and principles of groups and consolidated financial statements shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The concepts and principles of groups and consolidated financial statements questions
- Which of the following is the most likely indicator of significant influence over an investee under IAS 28?
- Parent Co acquired 70% of Sub Co on 1 April when Sub Co's retained earnings were $120,000. Share capital is $100,000 throughout. At 31 March…
- Parent Co owns 80% of Sub Co, acquired several years ago. During the year Parent Co sold goods to Sub Co for $120,000, making a profit of 25…
- Alpha acquires 30% of the equity shares of Beta and can exercise significant influence over it. Alpha has no control over Beta. In Alpha's c…
- Hold Co owns 75% of Sub Co. During the year Hold Co sold goods to Sub Co for $80,000, at a mark-up of 25% on cost. At the year end, Sub Co s…
- Cedar acquired 25% of Birch on 1 July 20X1 for $600,000. Birch's profit after tax for the year ended 31 December 20X1 was $240,000, accruing…