FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Art of Term Structure Models: Drift
In a Ho-Lee model with constant volatility σ = 1.00% per year, the short rate is 4.00% today and the drift λ(t) = 0.30% per year for all t. Ignoring any convexity effect on the expectation of the rate itself, what is the expected short rate after 2 years?
The expected short rate is 4.60%. In Ho-Lee the expected rate equals the initial rate plus drift times time, so 4.00% plus 0.30% for each of two years gives 4.60%. Volatility does not change the expected rate itself.
- A4.30%
- B4.60%Correct
- C5.00%
- D4.00%
Explanation
Since dr = λ dt + σ dw, E[r(T)] = r0 + λT = 4.00% + 0.30% × 2 = 4.60%. 4.30% uses one year only. 5.00% wrongly adds σ×T.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Art of Term Structure Models: Drift shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Art of Term Structure Models: Drift questions
- A risk manager notes that Ho-Lee calibrates perfectly to today's curve but is criticised for the shape of future rate dynamics. Which critic…
- A risk analyst compares two one-factor short-rate models calibrated to the same current term structure. Model A (Ho-Lee) has dr = λ(t)dt + σ…
- In the Ho-Lee model with constant σ, the drift is calibrated to the forward curve. Let F(t) be the instantaneous forward rate. The drift is …
- A risk manager is calibrating a CIR model with k = 0.25 and long-run mean θ = 4%. The risk premium term is λ√r, and the risk-neutral process…
- A Vasicek model has k = 0.40 per year. Approximately how long is the half-life of a deviation of the short rate from θ, and what does the ha…
- A risk manager compares Model 1 (zero drift) with Model 2 (constant positive risk-neutral drift λ) with the same σ. Holding r0 fixed, how do…