FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Hypothesis Testing
In a simple regression of a portfolio's excess returns on market excess returns using 62 observations, the estimated beta is 1.15 with a standard error of 0.10. Testing H0: beta = 1 against a two-sided alternative, the test statistic and conclusion at the 5% level are closest to (critical t with 60 df is about 2.00):
The t statistic is 1.50, found as (1.15 minus 1.00) divided by 0.10. Because it is below the critical value of about 2.00 at the 5% level, the analyst fails to reject that beta equals 1. Using a null of zero would wrongly give 11.5.
- At = 1.50; fail to reject H0Correct
- Bt = 11.5; reject H0
- Ct = 1.50; reject H0
- Dt = 0.15; fail to reject H0
Explanation
The null value is 1, not 0, so t = (1.15 - 1)/0.10 = 1.50. This is below the critical value of about 2.00, so H0 is not rejected. The 11.5 figure tests beta = 0, the wrong null.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Hypothesis Testing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Hypothesis Testing questions
- A risk manager backtests a 95% VaR model over 500 days. The model produced 35 exceptions. Using a two-tailed z-test at the 5% significance l…
- A researcher tests H0: mu = 5 against H1: mu > 5 using a sample of 64 observations with a known population standard deviation of 4. The samp…
- A risk manager backtests a 95% one-day VaR over 500 days and records 35 exceptions. Using the normal approximation to the binomial, with a t…
- An analyst builds a 95% confidence interval for a mean using a sample of 25 observations from a normally distributed population with unknown…
- A fund manager claims the standard deviation of monthly returns is 4.0%. A sample of 21 monthly returns gives a sample standard deviation of…
- Holding the sample size and true parameter value fixed, a researcher lowers the significance level of a two-sided z-test from 5% to 1%. Whic…