IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Actuarial Statistics · Credibility theory: Bayesian and empirical Bayes credibility premiums
In the Bühlmann model, which change would increase the credibility factor Z for a given policyholder, other things equal?
A larger variance of the hypothetical means increases Z. It reduces k = E[s²]/Var[m], so the policyholder's own experience gets more weight because risks genuinely differ. The collective mean does not affect Z.
- AA larger expected process variance E[s²(θ)]
- BA smaller variance of the hypothetical means Var[m(θ)]
- CFewer years of observed experience n
- DA larger variance of the hypothetical means Var[m(θ)]Correct
- A change in the collective mean only
Explanation
Z = n/(n+k) with k = E[s²]/Var[m]. Raising Var[m] lowers k and so raises Z. Raising E[s²] or lowering n reduces Z, and the collective mean does not enter Z.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Credibility theory: Bayesian and empirical Bayes credibility premiums shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Credibility theory: Bayesian and empirical Bayes credibility premiums questions
- Empirical Bühlmann estimation uses data on 3 risks, each with 4 years of claims. Risk means are 10, 14 and 12. Within-risk sample variances …
- Four risks each have three years of data. The risk means are 20, 24, 16 and 28. The sums of squared deviations of the observations from thei…
- In the Bühlmann credibility model, the credibility factor is Z = n/(n + k). Which expression gives k in terms of the process variance E[s²(θ…
- Claim counts per year are Poisson(λ) with prior λ ~ Gamma(α = 3, rate β = 6). After n years of experience with sample mean x̄, the posterior…
- Given θ, claim amounts X are Normal(θ, variance 400). The prior for θ is Normal(mean 1000, variance 100). One observation x = 1100 is made. …
- A policyholder's claim amount X in a year has conditional mean μ(θ) and variance σ²(θ). Across risks, E[σ²(θ)] = 400 and Var[μ(θ)] = 100. Th…