IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Actuarial Statistics · Credibility theory: Bayesian and empirical Bayes credibility premiums
In the Bühlmann-Straub model, the variance of the claim ratio X_ij given θ_i is s²(θ_i)/m_ij. What does this assumption imply?
Observed claim ratios have lower variance when exposure is larger, since variance is s²(θ)/m. Years with more exposure are more reliable and receive greater weight in the credibility estimate.
- AVariance of observed ratios falls as exposure risesCorrect
- BVariance of observed ratios rises with exposure
- CVariance is the same for all exposures
- DClaim ratios are perfectly correlated across years
- Hypothetical means depend on exposure
Explanation
Dividing by m_ij means larger exposure gives a smaller variance, so observations with larger exposure are more reliable and weighted more heavily.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Credibility theory: Bayesian and empirical Bayes credibility premiums shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Credibility theory: Bayesian and empirical Bayes credibility premiums questions
- In the Bühlmann credibility model, the credibility factor is Z = n/(n + k). Which expression gives k in terms of the process variance E[s²(θ…
- Claim counts per year are Poisson(λ) with prior λ ~ Gamma(α = 3, rate β = 6). After n years of experience with sample mean x̄, the posterior…
- Given θ, claim amounts X are Normal(θ, variance 400). The prior for θ is Normal(mean 1000, variance 100). One observation x = 1100 is made. …
- A policyholder's claim amount X in a year has conditional mean μ(θ) and variance σ²(θ). Across risks, E[σ²(θ)] = 400 and Var[μ(θ)] = 100. Th…
- In Bühlmann credibility, which change would increase the credibility factor Z for a given risk?
- Which statement about the Bayesian credibility premium under squared error loss is correct?