CMA Final · Cost and Management Audit · Cost Auditing and Assurance Standards
In the context of SCA 103, which statement best reflects professional skepticism?
Professional skepticism is a questioning mind with a critical assessment of audit evidence, applied throughout the audit. The auditor must not settle for less-than-persuasive evidence just because management seems honest, and representations cannot replace sufficient appropriate evidence.
- AManagement representations may replace sufficient appropriate audit evidence when integrity is believed
- BA critical, questioning assessment of evidence, not accepting less-than-persuasive evidence on a belief that management is honestCorrect
- CSkepticism is required only at the planning stage
- DSkepticism means assuming management is dishonest
Explanation
SCA 103 describes skepticism as a questioning mind and critical assessment of evidence, necessary throughout the audit. The auditor should not accept weak evidence because of a belief in management's honesty, and representations are no substitute for evidence.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Cost Auditing and Assurance Standards shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Cost Auditing and Assurance Standards questions
- A cost auditor has complied with most, but not all, Cost Auditing Standards relevant to an audit, and the omitted standard was relevant beca…
- According to SCA 103, a Cost Auditing Standard is 'relevant to the audit' when:
- Under SCA 103, what level of assurance does a cost auditor obtain about whether the Cost Statements taken as a whole are free from material …
- According to SCA 103, how should a cost auditor treat management representations when forming the audit opinion?
- According to SCA 103, when may a cost auditor represent compliance with the Cost Auditing Standards in the cost auditor's report?
- Where the cost auditor cannot obtain reasonable assurance, SCA 103 states that the cost auditor should: