Skip to content

CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets

Ind AS 37 notes that, in a general sense, all provisions are contingent. Meghna Textiles Ltd's finance head asks why provisions are still recognised while items called 'contingent' are not. Which explanation is consistent with the Standard?

Provisions are uncertain in timing or amount, but Ind AS 37 limits the word 'contingent' to liabilities and assets whose existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control, and to liabilities failing recognition criteria. Provisions are present obligations, so they are recognised.

  1. AProvisions are recognised because their timing or amount is certain, whereas contingent items are uncertain
  2. BWithin the Standard, 'contingent' is reserved for liabilities and assets whose existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control, so provisions are treated separately even though their timing or amount is uncertainCorrect
  3. CProvisions are recognised only when the entity has a possible obligation, while contingent liabilities are present obligations
  4. DProvisions and contingent liabilities are the same, and recognition depends only on management's choice

Explanation

The Standard says all provisions are uncertain in timing or amount, but 'contingent' is used for liabilities and assets not recognised because their existence depends on uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control. Option A is wrong because provisions are not certain in timing or amount. Option C reverses the definitions.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets questions