CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Ind AS 37 notes that, in a general sense, all provisions are contingent. Meghna Textiles Ltd's finance head asks why provisions are still recognised while items called 'contingent' are not. Which explanation is consistent with the Standard?
Provisions are uncertain in timing or amount, but Ind AS 37 limits the word 'contingent' to liabilities and assets whose existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control, and to liabilities failing recognition criteria. Provisions are present obligations, so they are recognised.
- AProvisions are recognised because their timing or amount is certain, whereas contingent items are uncertain
- BWithin the Standard, 'contingent' is reserved for liabilities and assets whose existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control, so provisions are treated separately even though their timing or amount is uncertainCorrect
- CProvisions are recognised only when the entity has a possible obligation, while contingent liabilities are present obligations
- DProvisions and contingent liabilities are the same, and recognition depends only on management's choice
Explanation
The Standard says all provisions are uncertain in timing or amount, but 'contingent' is used for liabilities and assets not recognised because their existence depends on uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control. Option A is wrong because provisions are not certain in timing or amount. Option C reverses the definitions.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets questions
- Under Ind AS 37, a transaction that meets the definition of a provision is recognised as a liability only when certain conditions are met. W…
- Kaveri Engineering Ltd has a present obligation from a past event, and an outflow of economic benefits is probable. However, the company can…
- Kaveri Infra Ltd is defendant in three matters at the reporting date. Matter 1: present obligation, outflow probable, amount reliably estima…
- Which of the following best captures why Ind AS 37 says that in a general sense all provisions are contingent, yet uses the term 'contingent…
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd. is sued by a customer for alleged defective fabric. At the reporting date, the company's lawyers say it is not yet cl…
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd is sued by a customer for alleged defective fabric. At the reporting date, its lawyers say it has yet to be confirmed …