CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Ind AS 37 uses the word 'contingent' in a restricted sense, although in a general sense all provisions are uncertain in timing or amount. Which description matches the use of 'contingent' in the Standard?
Within Ind AS 37, 'contingent' refers to liabilities and assets that are not recognised because their existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control. Uncertainty of timing or amount alone does not make an item contingent.
- ALiabilities and assets not recognised because their existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's controlCorrect
- BAll liabilities whose settlement date or amount is uncertain
- CLiabilities that are recognised but disclosed separately because their amount is estimated
- DObligations that arise only from a legally enforceable contract
Explanation
The Standard says that in a general sense all provisions are contingent, but within the Standard 'contingent' is used for liabilities and assets not recognised because their existence depends on uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control. Option B describes provisions, which are recognised, so it is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets questions
- Narmada Infra Ltd has a present obligation from a past event. The probability of an outflow is assessed at 35%, so an outflow is not probabl…
- Kaveri Textiles Ltd faces a claim from a customer. Legal counsel advises that it is not probable that Kaveri has a present obligation, but i…
- Sagar Pharma Ltd faces a lawsuit. Legal counsel confirms that the company has a present obligation, but considers it not probable that an ou…
- Bharat Pumps Ltd has a present obligation from a past event and an outflow is probable, but, due to the nature of the matter, no sufficientl…
- Sutlej Fabrics Ltd is defending a customer claim. Its lawyers advise that the company probably has no present obligation, but the court's de…
- Kaveri Engineering Ltd has a present obligation arising from a past event. Settlement is considered possible but not probable, and the amoun…