IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Actuarial Mathematics for Modelling · Valuing cashflows contingent on multiple transition events
Independent lives (x) and (y) have constant forces of mortality 0.02 and 0.03, and the force of interest is 0.05. An annuity of Rs 12,000 per year is payable continuously to (y) only after the death of (x), for as long as (y) survives. What is its EPV?
The EPV is Rs 30,000. The reversionary annuity factor is the single-life annuity to (y), 1/0.08 = 12.5, minus the joint-life annuity, 1/0.10 = 10, giving 2.5. Multiplying by Rs 12,000 gives Rs 30,000.
- ARs 51,428.57
- BRs 150,000.00
- CRs 120,000.00
- DRs 201,428.57
- Rs 30,000.00Correct
Explanation
A reversionary annuity is a_y - a_xy. Here a_y = 1/0.08 = 12.5 and a_xy = 1/0.10 = 10, so the factor is 2.5. Then 12,000 x 2.5 = Rs 30,000. Rs 51,428.57 reverses the roles, using a_x - a_xy. Rs 150,000 is the whole annuity to (y), a_y.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Valuing cashflows contingent on multiple transition events shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Valuing cashflows contingent on multiple transition events questions
- For a policy paying Rs 60,000 immediately on death, with continuous premiums of Rs 1,500 per year, the policy value at time 10 is Rs 20,000.…
- For a life policy with sum assured ₹80,000, level premiums of ₹1,500 per annum paid continuously, δ = 0.04 and μ = 0.02 at the current age, …
- Two independent lives (x) and (y) have constant forces of mortality 0.04 and 0.06 respectively. The force of interest is 5% per year. What i…
- When setting up Thiele's differential equation for a multiple state policy reserve in state i, which term represents the effect of a lump-su…
- A last-survivor assurance pays Rs 1,00,000 at the end of the year of the second death, for two independent lives (x) and (y), for a one-year…
- A health-sickness-death model has constant intensities: H to S 0.10, H to D 0.02, S to H 0.30, S to D 0.06. Which is the correct Kolmogorov …