CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Business Laws and Business Communication · Discharge of Contracts
Karan contracts to supply 100 bales of cloth to Lata, delivery next day, and Lata promises to pay within one month. Karan fails to deliver on the due day. Which statement is correct?
Lata's promise to pay need not be performed, and Karan must compensate her for any loss. Since delivery was to occur before payment fell due, Karan's default under Section 54 means he cannot claim the price and is liable for loss caused by non-performance.
- ALata's promise to pay need not be performed, and Karan must compensate her for lossCorrect
- BLata must still pay within a month and then claim damages
- CLata must pay half the price because the contract is divisible
- DThe contract is automatically void and no compensation is due
Explanation
Section 54 deals with reciprocal promises where one must be performed first. Karan's delivery had to be performed first, and his failure means he cannot claim payment and must compensate Lata for loss from non-performance. Requiring Lata to pay anyway reverses the rule, and nothing makes the contract void.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Discharge of Contracts shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Discharge of Contracts questions
- Hari agrees to buy 50 maunds of rice from Balu at a stated price, with no time fixed for delivery. Hari later informs Balu that he will not …
- Mehta Traders agrees to sell 50 maunds of rice to Gupta at a fixed price, with no delivery time fixed. Gupta later informs Mehta that he wil…
- Ravi owes Meera Rs 20,000 under a contract. Ravi, Meera and Kishore agree that Meera will henceforth accept Kishore as her debtor in place o…
- Meera agrees to repair Rohan's house for a fixed fee. Rohan refuses to point out the places in the house that need repair, so Meera cannot c…
- Arun owes Bhavna Rs 5,000. Bhavna agrees to accept Rs 2,000 paid at the time and place where Rs 5,000 was payable, in satisfaction of the wh…
- Under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a party who suffers because the other party has broken the contract can claim compensatio…