CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Kaveri Engineering Ltd. has a present obligation arising from a past event under a warranty dispute. Its lawyers state that an outflow of resources is probable, but the amount of the obligation cannot be estimated with sufficient reliability. Under Ind AS 37, how is this obligation classified?
It is a contingent liability. Although it is a present obligation with a probable outflow, a sufficiently reliable estimate of the amount cannot be made, so it fails the recognition criteria in Ind AS 37. It is therefore not recognised as a provision.
- AA provision, because the outflow is probable
- BA contingent asset, because the amount is uncertain
- CA contingent liability, because it is a present obligation that does not meet the recognition criteriaCorrect
- DAn item recognised as a liability at zero value
Explanation
Para 13(b)(ii) says a present obligation is a contingent liability when it fails the recognition criteria, including where a sufficiently reliable estimate cannot be made. Here the outflow is probable but no reliable estimate exists, so recognition fails. The provision option ignores the reliable-estimate condition.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets questions
- An analyst reviews four items of Narmada Steels Ltd. Item 1: present obligation, outflow probable, reliable estimate available. Item 2: pres…
- Ganga Foods Ltd faces a litigation where it is uncertain whether it has a present obligation (a possible obligation), and separately a suppl…
- Meghdoot Pharma Ltd faces a claim. Its legal counsel concludes that the entity probably has no present obligation, and that the claim will b…
- Kaveri Engineering Ltd has a present obligation from a past event to pay damages to a customer. An outflow is probable, but the company cann…
- Meghdoot Textiles Ltd is a defendant in a suit filed by a customer. Its lawyers say it is not yet certain whether the company owes anything …
- Ind AS 37 notes that, in a general sense, all provisions are contingent. Meghna Textiles Ltd's finance head asks why provisions are still re…