Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Leader · Reporting to stakeholders

Kestrel Foods publishes an ESG report with striking photographs and claims of being 'on the path to net zero'. It gives no baseline, no targets, no timeline and no data on its emissions, while its operations continue to expand fossil-fuel use. Which concern does this most directly raise for the board?

This raises greenwashing: Kestrel makes broad environmental claims without baselines, targets or emissions data and while expanding fossil-fuel use. The claims are therefore unsupported and misleading, creating reputational and regulatory risk, rather than being an issue of overload or balance sheet presentation.

  1. AGreenwashing, because the claims are not supported by evidenceCorrect
  2. BWindow dressing of the statement of financial position through off-balance-sheet finance
  3. CInformation overload from excessive quantitative disclosure
  4. DAgency problems caused by an excessively long-term horizon

Explanation

Unsubstantiated, vague environmental claims that do not match actual performance are greenwashing. The report lacks the baselines, targets and data needed for credibility, which exposes the company to reputational and regulatory risk. The report is short of data, so information overload is the opposite of the problem.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Reporting to stakeholders shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Reporting to stakeholdersFree diagnostic mock

More Reporting to stakeholders questions