Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Reporting (International) · Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period

Kestrel Ltd has a five-year contract to supply components at a fixed price. Because of a rise in material costs, the unavoidable costs of meeting the contract now exceed the economic benefits expected from it. Under IAS 37, how should Kestrel treat this?

Kestrel should recognise a provision for the onerous contract, because the unavoidable costs of fulfilling it exceed the expected benefits. This is a present obligation from a past event, so IAS 37 requires recognition rather than contingent liability disclosure.

  1. ARecognise a provision for the present obligation under the onerous contractCorrect
  2. BDisclose a contingent liability only, as the loss relates to future periods
  3. CRecognise nothing until the contract is cancelled
  4. DRecognise a provision for the full future operating losses of the business

Explanation

IAS 37 requires a present obligation under an onerous contract to be recognised as a provision. Disclosure only is wrong because the obligation is present and probable. Future operating losses outside the contract are not provided for.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period questions