CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Constitution of India
Meera, a resident of Pune, wants to approach the Supreme Court directly because the State has violated her right under Article 21. Under which Article can she move the Supreme Court for enforcement of her Fundamental Rights?
Article 32 is the correct provision. It guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of Fundamental Rights, and the Court can issue writs for that purpose. Article 226 concerns High Courts, not the Supreme Court.
- AArticle 32Correct
- BArticle 226
- CArticle 136
- DArticle 143
Explanation
Article 32 is itself a Fundamental Right and allows a person to move the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. Article 226 relates to High Courts, Article 136 to special leave to appeal, and Article 143 to the President's advisory reference.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Constitution of India shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Constitution of India questions
- In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, what did the Supreme Court hold regarding Parliament's power to amend the Constitution?
- An Ordinance is promulgated by the President while Parliament is not in session. Parliament reassembles on 1 July. Neither House passes a re…
- Which of the following is stated in Article 13 of the Constitution of India regarding laws that conflict with Fundamental Rights?
- Ravi was born in India in 1990 to parents who were Indian citizens. He later acquired citizenship of another country and voluntarily took a …
- Parliament proposes a law to reduce the area of an existing State by transferring a part of its territory to a neighbouring State. Which sta…
- A public official is holding a post for which he does not satisfy the statutory eligibility qualifications. Raman wants a court order asking…